Leave a comment

Mugabe my Hero..Happy Birthday Old boy, time to step down.

Mugabe with his first wife Sally Hayfron

Robert Mugabe celebrated his 87th birthday a few days ago, as a child my nicknames included Kaunda(ex-President of Zambia) and Mugabe, indeed one of my aunts still fondly calls me Mugabe. I’m not so sure I would like to be associated with the current version of Robert “Mad Bob” Mugabe. This hasn’t always been the case though, for at a certain time Mugabe was a hero of mine and no doubt many other Africans. With the help and influence of his beautiful Ghanaian wife Sally, Mugabe proved that sometimes you have to fight for what you believe is yours.

How this once great man who was the poster boy for African Nationalism became a reactionary dictator clinging onto power whilst overseeing the systemic breakdown of his country is a question that befuddles many, myself included.
Some of my friends (mostly European) find it difficult to understand why Mugabe is still held in such high esteem on the African continent,especially by the current crop African leaders; who lets be honest are not the brightest bunch, speak to most Africans about Mugabe and you will notice there’s still some affection for the old man.

 

Many in the West and some in Zimbabwe pray fervently that the current revolutionary fervour in North Africa will travel South and remove the “Monster” once and for all, something I’m convinced will never happen, not in Zimbabwe or any other Sub-Saharan African country (more in my next post). In Sub-Saharan Africa we do Military coups and Civil Wars,we don’t do popular uprisings.

 

I’m not going to be able to summarise the history of Zimbabwe and the man himself in this short post however if you are interested in finding out more about the Mugabe outside  the media caricature portrayed by the Western media Heidi Holland has a fantastic book based on her interviews with Mugabe.
One cannot ignore the fact that many Zimbabweans have suffered and died under Mugabes regime whilst him and his confidantes have continued to enjoy the trappings of wealth and power.Military units(whether under Mugabe’s command or not) have participated in the brutal torture and murder of members of the opposition whether it was after the recent elections or around the time of the battle for independence.

Robert Mugabe
These all happened under his rule and he will have to answer for them in a court of law(not very likely) or when he meets his maker.

The real victims of Mugabe’s failure are not the white farmers that the Western media is obsessed about, because lets be honest most of them are living comfortable lives whether its in Zimbabwe or the UK, but the indigenous population who were promised so much during the struggle for independence and yet have found themselves with so little.
Mugabe’s story is one of strife and determination, an awkward and bookish child he lost his older brother and his dad abandoned the family leaving him as the oldest and having to look after his brothers. He was influenced by his new father figure a British church minister, this may explain his love for quintessentially English Saville Row suits and immaculately cut shirts.

I have recently been reading letters Mugabe wrote to the British Government whilst in prison, and was amazed by the beauty of his writing. His eloquence and mastery of the Queens English clearly betrays  someone who is fond of the English, especially Royal family, its the tawdry politicians he has struggled to get along with.

 

It all went pear shaped when the badly mismanaged Land Reform programme went from bad to shambolic, Zimbabwe which was once the bread basket of Southern Africa was left to rely on the International community for food. I’m one of those who is  absolutely convinced of the need for Land Reform, it cant be right that white Zimbabweans should own over 50% of arable land whilst black Zimbabweans live in poverty, however Mugabe’s failure to execute the policy resulted in War veterans and Mugabe’s cronies taking land away from the white farmers some of who had been on the land for decades.

 

Unfortunately the new land owners knew very little about large scale agriculture and the rest of the story is history.
His clear disdain for Tony Blair and Gordon Brown stems from Labour going back on the British commitment during the Lancaster negotiation to fund land redistribution in Zimbabwe. The Conservatives who negotiated the Lancaster Agreement pledged to fund and support the land re-distribution process, something which Mugabe fought very hard for, however Blair’s decision not to fund it meant the only choice  was for Zimbabweans to resolve it themselves, something they failed to do.

Whatever happens in Zimbabwe one thing is for sure, Mugabe can expect a warm farewell when he finally steps down whether he is forced to by nature or  by the Military, because for all his foibles and imperfections he was the one who put his neck on the line in the fight for independence.


In Africa the freedom fighter who made the final push for independence will receive more loyalty and love than those who come after him irrespective of his achievements….

Leave a comment

mHealth Africa Summit—the Personal Emerging

Mhealth Summit in Accra organised by Mobile World & Anadach Group

Last month, I wrote mHealth: the Possibilities of the Personal about the importance of capitalizing on people’s personal attachments to and investments in their cellphones as a key to making mHealth programs scalable and widely successful. Then I went to Accra, Ghana for the mHealth Africa Summit, which gave me the opportunity to run this idea by a number of my colleagues from Ghana, Malawi, Kenya, and many other countries throughout Africa.

 

Like the mHealth Summit in Washington, D.C. in November, the Accra gathering was well-organized and filled with energy. It was also much smaller. This meant that the conversations were intimate and impassioned, and as expected, much more personal. As my colleague Piers Bocock at Management Sciences for Health pointed out in his blog, this conference offered great examples of country ownership. Like Piers, I, too, learned far more at this inaugural and important conference than I felt able to teach. It also offered me a great opportunity to hear more about the ways mobile phones were already being used by health workers, which I think is key to mHealth’s success, traction, and scalability.

For many of us who are deeply immersed in information and communication technology and development, the appeal of mobile phones is the ease with which you can connect. In Accra, however, I heard a striking example of how health workers are already using mobiles to do their work, which had little to do with this connectivity at all. In the United States, many of us own or use multiple electronic gadgets: a camera, a phone, a laptop, an iPod, an iPad… the list goes on. But in many developing countries, the mobile phone is a true convergence of devices, and as such, it is being used in many different ways.

For many people in developing countries, the mobile phone isn’t just their first phone, or their first computing device, but it is also their first camera. While in Accra, I heard the story of health workers in Ghana, Malawi, and other countries who are using their phones to photograph unusual skin diseases and other physical symptoms. They then turn to online services to diagnose these unknown maladies in their patients by comparing the photo with information they can find online. It is an industrious approach, and one I had not heard of before. Yet, I also learned that health workers are frustrated that there are not currently stronger systems in place to receive these images and support their diagnostic needs. But it seems like exactly the type of project an mHealth program could support in a way that is relatively simple and scalable. It would be a program that is driven by the expressed need on the part of the health worker rather than a top-down approach. Many health workers would need less training because they are already using a similar approach, and peer-to-peer mentorship could be established to reinforce the practice. A telehealth expert center could be created to receive the images and provide diagnostic support, track and map particular incidents, and provide epidemiological surveillance for particularly serious or virulent presenting symptoms. Compared to many of the mHealth programs I have heard of, this could be a low-cost, high-value system strengthening activity.

This is but one example of the real uses of mHealth that are already emerging.

For me, the second takeaway message from Accra was the innovative and growing power of the private sector in Africa. Dr. Ladi Awosika, CEO of Total Health Trust, one of the largest HMOs in Nigeria, talked about the ways mHealth technologies are being used in the private sector provider network, and how they may be expanded in both the public and private sectors. For example, he focused on how the emerging mBanking technologies in Africa can be combined with mHealth programs to support health insurance and other provider payments. With health financing a topic of increasing interest, the growing African private sector may offer some innovative solutions for ministries of health and other public sector offices to consider.

—Dykki Settle
Team Lead, eHealth/Informatics, CapacityPlus

4 Comments

Telecom’s industry heats up in Ghana

In the excitement about Ghana’s Oil find one sector which is seeing impressive expansion and “big money” deals is not getting as much attention as it should from Investors and commentators alike. I get regular emails from people enquiring about opportunities in the Oil & Gas sector in Ghana,whilst the Energy sector becomes saturated with foreign companies, ample opportunities exists in the Telecoms & ICT sector for both local and International firms.

Ghana’s telecoms sector has enjoyed a financial boost in the last couple of years, deals across both fixed and mobile platforms have brought some of the biggest operators in the world to the West African state.

The controversial sale of Ghana Telecom to Vodafone for a reported $900 million dollars and MTN’s sale of 51% of its tower assets to American Towers for over $400 million are some of the well known deals that have been reported.However there is a lot more happening on the ground with the Government recently granting two Wimax licenses to operators in the country with a further three up for grabs.

The Government has confirmed that Glo Telecom will be the sixth and last company to be granted a mobile license to operate in the country, with Glo expected to launch in the first quarter of 2011 some analysts are concerned the number of mobile operators in the country. MTN retains the largest market share of about 51.5% according to figures from the NCA.

A sure sign of maturity in the telecom sector is the rush to outsource tower management and ownership to third parties as a means of diversifying revenue as focusing on core activites.It all kicked off in January 2010 when Millicom Ghana(Tigo Ghana) agreed to sell 750 base towers to Helios Towers Africa(HTG), the deal was the first major sales/leaseback to be completed by major African telecoms operator and an independent tower company on the continent.

The George Soros backed Helios Towers already has a well established operation in Nigeria and is looking to move further into the Ghanaian market. Vodafone Ghana also signed a ten year deal with Eaton Towers to takeover the operations and co-location management of its existing tower infrastructure. The deal is reported to be worth $45 million to Eaton Towers,who’s directors are ex-Vodafone employees. MTN rounded off the deals for 2010 with their joint venture with American Towers raising $428million for the Mobile operator, Airtel is also actively looking for a deal to introduce its Tower business for which it is well known in India to the African market, and Ghana looks to be the first country that might benefit from Airtel’s experience in tower management.

The National Communications Authority which regulates the telecoms sector has recently called for applications for licenses to build infrastructure, mostly communication towers. One would expect the existing tower companies in addition to Airtel to be granted licenses for further expansion. The tower business model is prevalent in India where the large population means mobile companies have to invest massively in tower infrastructure, but even the operators are still a bit hesitant about giving away full control of their towers compared to the US, where majority of towers are managed by third parties with American Towers and Crown Towers being the biggest players in the sector,

In order to prevent chaotic building of towers all over the country and to placate the citizenry who are nervous about the radiation effects of these towers, only licensed companies will be allowed to build and operate new towers, the hope is that the mobile networks will buy space from the newly licensed operators rather than build their own towers. Companies will have to pay an initial $25,000 fee in order to apply for the license and a final fee of $200,000 if their application is successfull.

The next battle for mobile operators in Ghana will be to discover other means of improving their revenues, no one knows this better than Airtel, whos’ African operations are not making any money as yet. Airtel is actively looking to expand its role in the Tower business and expects to be given a license in Ghana to build several more towers which it hopes to lease out to other operators.

Whilst the opportunities to make money in the mobile sector in Ghana remain buoyant, the network operators are increasingly looking at other sources of revenue as they’re forced to cut call prices in order to stay competitive.

It is against this background that Mobile World Magazine is organising the “ Ghana ICT &Telecom Summit on the 28th-29th of April 2011 in Accra, it will be the first gathering where both operators and regulators will join officials from the Ministry of Communications to plot the future of the telecoms industry in Ghana.

Issues such as Mobile Number Portability, International Gateway taxes and improving rural connectivity will all be discussed at the summit. The role of infrastructure companies in the development of Ghana’s telecoms sector will be one of the key issues to be discussed by the delegates. The summit which is being chaired by Dr Ekwow Spio-Garbrah the outgoing chairman of the C.T.O and former Minister of Communications for Ghana will also explore growth strategies for the ICT market in Ghana and what role investors can play in driving this growth.

This has been a great year for the telecoms sector in Africa and Ghana especially, 2011 will be the year Investors look to recoup their investments. Mobile Applications, Mobile broadband and continued expansion in telecoms Infrastructure will be some the areas to watch over the next 12 months.

The NCA is also expected to confirm the five companies granted Wimax licenses to operate in Ghana. With the NCA (Regulator) now run by a former Investment banker it is hoped that relationships between operators and the regulator will improve and issues such as the International Gateway Tax, Sim Registration and Number Portability will be resolved amicably.

Tony Burkson,

Leave a comment

Who you calling Corrupt?

“In China they have efficient Corruption, you get what you pay for, In India they have inefficient Corruption, you never know who you will have to pay next” 

This statement was made by an International Development Guru on the BBC’s radio 4, it had me thinking about a discussion I had with an Oxford graduate (African Studies) who had written a paper on corruption in Africa.

My argument was against the premise that Corruption, Bribery or whatever else you want to call it is solely an African issue,Corruption  exists in most countries in the world, however it has become the bogeyman for commentators looking  to explain why western interventions have failed in Africa. They use Corruption in Africa to explain why billions of aid which has been sunk into the continent has failed to achieve the expected outcomes.

These commentators often forget the greater harm caused by the World Bank’s Structural Adjustment Programmes, or the West’s acquiescence in doing business with African dictators or for that matter the historical damage done by colonialism and Slavery. There is no one reason why Africa remains poor, its a combination of factors. As my Senegalese friend says, if paying a small bribe means I get my passport  application  processed quicker, so what?

In the Asian part of the world Corruption has actually aided development, from Thailand to Indonesia to China and India paying bribes to speed up the flow of business is an everyday occurrence, yet these countries have gone on to post some of the most impressive growth numbers.

The point I’m trying to make is the fact that Nigeria is abound in corruption is not the sole reason why 70% of its population still live on the poverty line. The reasons why many African countries are still poor despite being abound in natural resources is far more complex than people taking bungs.

I would like argue that Africa’s failure has less to do with corruption but rather everything to do with the greed of the ruling elite and the richest 10%, who insist on spending their wealth mostly on imported and foreign goods, they refuse to acknowledge and  nurture a middle class, the “so called trickle-down economics” doesn’t exist in Africa. Social Mobility is just a theory in most African countries, rags to riches stories are indeed rare on the continent. 

In America lobbyists and their clients contribute financially to elected politicians in exchange for influencing policy, indeed this is all legal as long as its declared, the Jack Abramoff scandal showed how thin the line was between lobbying and outright corruption.(I must confess I have lobbied in the past)

Recently in the UK, the Secretary of State for International Development(DFID) got into trouble after it came out he had lobbied the Vice President of Ghana to remove a ban that had been placed on a British Company operating in Ghana after the firm broke local regulations. The ban was lifted after the Vice-President intervened, but it turned out  the company in question had contributed over £40,000 to office of the UK minister.. is that Corruption?

In the ideal world there would be no need for need for Bribery or Corruption but the reality is somewhat different, I hope I have demonstrated from the previous paragraphs that Africa doesn’t have a monopoly on Corruption, many countries have developed and prospered in the midst of corruption.

What is needed across the continent is more transparent politics, yes I believe we need more lobbyists in African countries, every Government policy or decision should be made in an open and transparent way and people in society should be able to take on the Government and try to argue their opinions, it already happens on radio stations all across the African Continent, what we need now is to formalise it and force African politicians to publish all their meetings with businessman and lobby groups. Once the policy making process becomes as transparent as the tendering process, real change will start across the continent.

Am I wrong? Do you think I’m deluded and that Corruption is the bane of African Society, I’d love to hear your opinion.

Leave a comment

Experts gather in London to review opportunities in Ghana

With the Ghanaian economy forecast to grow by 13% in 2011 if your company doesn’t already have a plan to tap into this market then you may be missing out on a big pay day. One of the key reasons for this boost in growth is the Oil discovery which many are hoping will change the fortunes of Ghanaians.

It is against this backdrop that experts will be meeting in London next week (26th November) to discuss the current opportunities in Ghana. Recently Ghana’s economy has been forecast to be 75% larger than previously thought, this re-calibration puts Ghana into the group of “middle income status” states. What this means for people on the ground is slightly harder to pin down, however one point is which is clear, this is a country which is on its way up.

The country expects to unleash a host of infrastructure and building projects aimed at moving Ghana to the next step of development, however for may western companies there’s a slight nervousness about taking the big step of moving to Ghana.

It is for this reason that the Star 100 Network have put together an exciting panel to address the opportunities and concerns that people looking to invest in Ghana may have. The event will also look specifically at opportunities in the Oil industry be it upstream or downstream.

Leading the panel is Razia Khan, Standard Chartered Bank’s London-based Head of Macro-Economics and Regional Head of Research, Africa, another well known and respected analyst  Rolake Akinola of the Eurasia group will also contribute to the discussions. The event will serve to bring together expert opinion from Academia (Prof. Rick Van Der Ploeg of Oxford will be on the panel), the Finance sector and Government to look at how companies can take advantage of this rising tiger.

A popular saying I learnt from my time in Boarding school in Ghana “ In all things Strike while the Iron is Hot” , the proverbial Iron is very hot in Ghana at the moment and the country has seen an influx of Ghanians from the Diaspora heading back home to grab a piece of the pie, an  example is Adisa Tinorgah a former Wall Street Banker who moved back to Ghana to set up a successful personalised gift shop serving an up and coming middle class who are suddenly finding themselves with disposable income  to spend.

For those interested in Ghana, the Star 100 Network event on the 26th of November offers the  chance to learn about  opportunities in Ghana and to network with people already working in Ghana.

Leave a comment

Opportunities for “mHealth” in Africa

The term “mHealth” is suddenly every where in the media these days, thanks to the likes Bill Gates, Vodafone Foundation and the Rockfeller foundation championing the possibilities that this innovative approach can bring to health not just in the Developing world but also in the Developed world.  

Recently in London a doctor created an iphone app  called the i-stethoscope which allows people to monitor their heartbeat and see their heart wave form, this may seem like a vanity app created to serve the worried  well, however in Africa developers are using simple SMS protocols to create mhealth applications that are  saving real lives.

Across the developing world, especially in west Africa, counterfeit drugs are a serious problem. it is estimated that  45% drugs in Nigeria are fake. The World Trade Organisation estimated that fake malaria drugs accounted for 100,000 African deaths a year.

In comes two African start-ups using  simple SMS protocol  of mobile phones to reduce the amount of counterfeit drugs in the system, Dr Ashifi Gogo of  Sproxil and  Mr Bright Simmons of mPedigree have both created simple solutions that use SMS to verify whether a drug is counterfeit or not, President Bill Clinton recently described Gogo’s work as “a genuinely remarkable achievement.”                                                                                          

The opportunities in mhealth do not  lie solely in pharmaceuticals, there are many strands of applications across the African continent where the mobile phone is being used to radically improve the lives of poor people who might not have direct access to medical practitioners.

It’s against this backdrop that Global mobile communication and health experts are set to meet in Ghana this December to discuss appropriate and timely solutions that involve mobile heatlh,The mHealth Africa Summit will explore the use of mobile technologies to improve access to quality health care, particularly in under-served populations; and in health research, training,and education applications in Africa.

Mobile phones have the ability to revolutionize several components of the health delivery system, including: collecting clinical and community health data, monitoring patient vitals signs in real-time, augmenting the direct provision of care by linking health care workers to patients, delivering health care information to practitioners,researchers, and patients as well as addressing supply chain management problems.

Mobile phones could also play a significant role in health financing systems, including authentication of health insurance subscribers, monitoring of health benefits and paying for health services and products.The mHealth Africa Summit presents an opportunity to bring together interested parties from around the world working in the health care and associated sectors to exchange ideas, discuss innovative solutions, explore scalabilty and sustainability of successful pilots, and develop collaborations in Africa.

The financial opportunity for companies involved in mhealth can not be underestimated, the success of the M-Pesa mobile money system in Kenya demonstrates the possible returns that early adopters of mobile technology in Africa can make, It is estimated around 11% of Kenya’s GDP passed through the M-PESA system in 2008.

The big telecom companies all have mhealth on their radar,with Telefonica, Vodafone and Orange establishing Healthcare divisions,whether these companies can be convinced to look at Africa first remains to be seen, however it is an opportunity that many African financiers are pursuing with a passion. With African Universities producing smart IT graduates looking to code and develop applications who knows where the next  “mhealth” application that revolutionizes healthcare in Africa will come from.

Leave a comment

mhealth Africa summit debuts in Ghana(Accra)

Africa seeks better health solutions through mobile technologies

 

Global mobile communication and health experts are set to meet in Ghana this December to discuss appropriate and timely solutions to Africa’s pressing health problems.

Delegates from across Africa, Europe, North America, Asia and the Middle East will gather at the inaugural Mobile Health (mhealth) Africa Summit, according to MrAkin Naphtal, the conference co-director.

The conference is scheduled to take placebetween December 2 and 3, at the Labadi Hotel, in Accra under the organization of MobileWorld and the Anadach Group.

“This summit will explore the use of mobile technologies to improve access to qualityhealth care, particularly in underserved populations; and in health research, training,and education applications in Africa,” said Mr. Naphtal.

Mobile phones have the ability to revolutionize several components of the health delivery system, including: collecting clinical and community health data, monitoring patient vitals signs in real-time, augmenting the direct provision of care by linking health care workers to patients, delivering healthcare information to practitioners,researchers, and patients as well as addressing supply chain management problems.

Bas Hoefman, Founder and Director, Textto Change, Holland

 

Mobile phones could also play a significant role in health financing systems, including authentication of health insurance subscribers, monitoring of health benefits and paying for health services and products.The mHealth Africa Summit presents an opportunity to bring together interested parties from around the world working in the health care and associated sectors to exchange ideas, discuss innovative solutions, explore scalabilty and sustainability of successful pilots, and develop collaborations in Africa.

“It is an opportunity for all stakeholders to come together and channel key implementation of mHealth deployment in Africa.” The conference which will become an annual event comes at a time when mobile penetration rates on the African continent are rising at a high rate.

 

In 2009, Africa was estimated to have more than 379 million mobile phone users compared to 246 million in 2008. “It is the precise time to put more focus on the growth of mHealth in Africa. With that fact mobile is perhaps the fastest and cost effective and interactive way to reach the rural areas in term of health delivery,” explained Dr Egbe Osifo-Dawodu, founding partner Anadach Group.

 

For health and ICT entrepreneurs, the new platform creates an opportunity todevelop innovative ideas that address existing problems or create new solutionsto improve healthcare. “Most African countries are not on track to meet the UN’sMillennium Development Goals so the need for innovation has never been greater,”Dr Alade, the conference co-director asserted.

The summit hopes to provide  a great opportunity in discussing and learning more on the future of mhealth in Africa. Through the forum, mobile and health experts will review the mHealth opportunities and challenges in Africa.

In addition, experts will discuss and understand the role regulators in developing mHealth on the continent drawing comparisons with the developed world.

 

“This is an opportunity for participants to gain insight into case studies of various mhealth deployments and initiatives, deeperunderstanding on the business model of mhealth, networking,” Mr Napthal added.

Speakers at the conference will include; Hon.Prof. Peter Nyongo, the Kenya Ministerfor Medical Services who will also be the special guest, Brooke Partridge, CEO andfounder, Vital Wave Consulting, USA, Bas Hoefman, Founder and Director, Textto Change, Holland Dr Ashifi Gogo, Sproxil, Nigeria, Konstantinos Tzingakis is theHead of Innovations and Partnering at Ericsson Sub-Saharan Africa, Mr TundeFafunwa, Senior Partner Kitskoo, Phillipines, Mr Piers Bocock, Senior Director,Management Sciences for Health, USA,, Ruchi Dass, Wireless Healthcare, E-healthand Healthcare IT Champion, Bright Simons, CEO, mPedigree, Ghana; amongothers.

 

CONFERNCE HIGHLIGHTS:

» Review of mHealth in Africa- Opportunities & Challenges» Role of regulators in developing mHealth in Africa

» Delivering healthcare via mobile phones & technology – experience from theground in several African Countries.»» Building your business case for profitable mobile health deployments inemerging markets

For more information or to register for the conference visit  http://www.mhealthafricasummit.com/

 

 

Leave a comment

DFID Looks to the Private Sector to help with the fight against POVERTY

This week saw the unveiling of what at first glance seems to be a radical shift in Policy by the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID).

In a major speech this week Andrew Mitchell the Secretary of State announced that DFID will now be looking more to the Private Sector to bring in their expertise on Business and Enterprise to aid International Development efforts.

Whether this is genuine change in policy or just another empty speech made to placate the growing masses of opinion against Aid remains to be seen. Many people including myself have argued for a very long time that unless there’s an increased focus on trade, business and job creation in poor countries the international community risks spending billions on legacy projects that will achieve nothing in the long term.

In this regard Andrew Mitchell’s speech is a step in the right  direction however its implementation will be keenly monitored by observers. As the rest of the United Kingdom prepares for radical cuts in Public Spending many of the population in the UK are beginning to question why the Government has decided to ring fence the Aid Budget.

The speech can be summarised in four succinct points:

Private Investment: A new Private Sector Department will be established inside DFID to boost the role of private enterprise in the poorest developing countries, the fact that this now being done tells you everything you need to know about what the focus of DFID has been the past. The new department will have business experts seconded to it to provide advice to civil servants on private enterprise

Reduced Barriers to Growth: The UK will focus on reducing barriers to growth in the poorest developing countries, there will be an increased focus on levelling the playing field for all investors and helping poor countries to streamline market entry and reduce the amount of work involved in setting up businesses. In my previous writings I’ve increasingly argued that steps like these even though may seem basic are the building blocks for economic development. Rwanda’s achievement in this area is clear for all to see and I hope DFID will liaise with the Rwandan Government to help and advice other African countries adopt a pro-business approach to regulation.

Trade negotiations: A renewed push for a successful conclusion to the Doha trade talks, global reforms that could bring gains three times the volume of global aid. I’m rather suspicious of how much leverage DFID can bring to the Doha trade talks, these talks have been going for years and it’s in the interest both the Developed and Developing world to come to a conclusion that is acceptable to all parties

Reform of the CDC: The final and most radical part of the speech was the proposed reform of the CDC; the development finance institution owned by the UK Government will be radically reformed and revitalised to drive more effectively investment in countries where businesses cannot usually find investment partners. The reform of the CDC if carried out in the right way could revolutionize the way business is done in Africa, currently start-ups and SME’s in Africa are starved of credit same as is happening in the UK at the moment, if the CDC could be convinced to relax its remit and actually look to putting its funds at the disposal of SME’s in Africa the result could be huge increase in company formations and business growth in the region. I get the impression from Andrew Mitchell’s speech that this is what he is aiming for.

The speech echoes one made recently by Bob Geldof who after years of campaigning for more bilateral aid and debt relief performed a  spectacular u-turn last month, insisting that it was Trade and commerce rather than aid that would change the fortunes of the millions living in poverty in Africa. Cynics noted that the speech was made as Bob Geldof launched a private equity vehicle to raise funds to invest in Africa

The challenge that lies ahead for DFID is a tough one, as an organisation Trade and Commerce have never been at the core of its activities, and this is certainly not the first time the organisation has announced sweeping changes to the way it carries out its work.

Previously DFID announced it was going to be moving away from the Economic Development Assistance approach i.e. building schools and wells to a more “rights” based approach i.e. people in poor countries should demand schools and wells.

How did the new approach work out?  Well in essence they led to DFID spending hundreds of millions of taxpayer funds on Advocacy and communications, how these will actually improve the lots of poor people in the world remains to be seen, see here and here for more information on DFID expenditure on advocacy.

Two days ago at a networking lunch I asked Stephen O’brien ( A minister at DFID) whether  the new focus on Private Sector Enterprise meant  DFID was moving away from its reliance on “Aid”  to a purely “Trade focused”  settlement, his answer wasn’t exactly what I was expecting, after regurgitating parts of his speech he’d made earlier he concluded by admitting that as much as he accepted the importance of trade, the was a need to transition  from the current system to a more private sector trade focused approach to International Development. Surely the fact that 60 years on little has been achieved by the current approach to development is enough to justify completely changing it. Why it has to be transitioned defeats me.

What I found most interesting was that after the lunch I was approached by some Africans at the same event and castigated for having the nerve to criticize African countries, as part of my question I pointed out to the minister that a lot of DFID money spent in Africa ended up in Swiss bank accounts and this clearly didn’t sit well with some of the African delegation at the event.

Why does any of this matter I hear you ask? Well it matters because I think DFID can become an incredible force for good, one of the biggest problems for businesses in Africa is a lack of access to credit.

Farmers can’t afford fertilizer or modern agricultural tools to help increase yield and hence their earnings, tech start-ups can’t finding funding to leverage their ideas because Venture Capitalists are only interested in projects that are already making money, Local Banks will only lend to long established and profitable businesses.

This is where DFID can make a huge difference if for example the CDC can be reformed so that its funds are invested in smaller companies in poor countries rather than already established firms who can raise funds from the private sector it will only mean one thing for Africa… an increase in jobs which in turn will lead to an increase in growth and living standards for the poor.

Whether DFID will be able to achieve its goals remains to be seen….I for one won’t be betting on it

Leave a comment

The Millenium Development Goals – Goals or Aspirations

Last week at the Department for International Development in London the Deputy Prime Minister of the United Kingdom Nick Clegg was joined by Henry Bellingham the Foreign Office Minister for Africa and Andrew Mitchell the International Development Secretary. They announced that the UK was going to strive to achieve the Millennium Development Goals and encourage other members of the G7 to follow suit. Watching the presentation got me thinking about the Millennium Development Goals and how they came about in the first place.

Were these laudable goals agreed by the heads of developing countries at one of their summits in consultation with local community organisations,taking into account the situation on the ground? Or was it another top down programme foisted on the developing world by  Western experts and development economists who’s experience and understanding of the poor in the world are based on Gap years,stints at the World Bank & IMF and most importantly time spent working for NGO’s ?

In September 2000 at the UN, the largest ever gathering of heads-of-state unanimously adopted the Millennium Declaration, committing to reach eight goals by 2015.
Known as the MDGs these are the  measure by which  International development efforts are to be judged. It was estimated that at the time that in order to reach these goals the Developed World would have to dig into their pockets and provide another $50billion in aid commitments. Have you noticed how most of these International programmes involve donor countries spending more and more money ?

There is nothing wrong with the goals per-se, how can anyone be against eradicating extreme poverty and hunger or for that matter promoting gender equality in the developing world. Africa still has some of the highest maternal death rates in the world,so any thing that helps reduce this can only be a good thing right?

So how is it that apart from China and India most other developing nations are no where close to achieving any of these goals?The UN press machine and the Overseas Development Institute have been pushing the story of how Ghana & Vietnam are doing well in their pursuit of these goals, however speaking to people on the ground in Ghana  their experience is slightly different from that of the Overseas Development Institute and the UN press machine.

Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger

Goal 8: Develop a Global Partnership for Development

From the UN website

When the UN and its host of International Development Agencies meet later today, they will announce that most of Sub-Saharan Africa is far off from achieving the goals, indeed some countries might have actually reversed  achievements they’ve made. The financial tsunami we have just experienced took care of that. The most likely call that will go out will be for an increase in Development Aid, my question to them is this; Haven’t we been here before?

In September 2005 the same group of people met in New York to discuss the MDG’s, and back then as it is now most Sub-Saharan African countries were still no where near achieving these goals even though Aid had increased from $53billion in 2000 to $73billion in 2004.

The trend is quite clear, the International Development community and their friends in the NGO world got to together to hash out an over ambitious plan which they knew they would most likely never be achieved. Every five years they meet to pat each other on the back and come out with the same press releases i.e we have seen some progress but we are still far off from achieving these goals hence we need more development aid in order to achieve them.

World leaders not wanting to appear uncaring agree to increase their pledges, the Aid community get more money for their projects and everyone goes away till the next meeting. The biggest losers from all of this is the poor in Africa who have no say in any of this, they just get told these are the goals you need to achieve and we will spend a couple of million from taxpayers in the West to see if we can achieve them.

.Whilst these goals are undoubtedly well intentioned they are just not practical, different countries have different issues, and to expect more than 100 countries to achieve the same goals in a defined period seems rather simplistic.

Many African countries are averaging growth rates between 4-7%, Nigeria is expected to grow 10% in 2010. A Deputy Minister of Finance in Ghana mentioned to me that he wouldn’t be surprised by double digit growth in the Ghanaian economy next year. The point I’m trying to make is that rather than focus on some contrived universal goal, we should look at each country individually and consider holistic solutions that take into account each country’s strengths and weakness’s.

Looking at the ODI’s report some countries in Africa have made some progress in increasing the number of children in primary school, reducing maternal deaths as well reducing poverty, however because the MDG’s have absolute targets which fail to take account of where some countries are starting from the result that the media will focus on is this that we have failed to achieve the goals.

There will probably be report out today which will say more Aid will help in closing the poverty gap and increase the chances of achieving the MDG’s. As I have argued previously the data on Aid and its relation Economic Development is not as clear cut as is sometimes made out, whilst Aid will contribute to some growth and Economic Development, no amount of Aid will make Africa achieve the consistent growth that both India and China are experiencing.

In order to achieve consistent 7-8% growth a country has to be making and selling things to the rest of the world.Its as simple as that, you don’t need an economics degree from Harvard to work out that Trade is the only way out of poverty.

So as the world experts meet in the United Nations to  begin their high level talks my two pence to the motherland is this, GOOD GOVERNANCE & TRADE is the surest route out of poverty.

In conclusion I would like to propose to the UN that rather than MDG’s( Millennium Development Goals) we should  have MDA’s( Millennium Development Aspirations), followers of British politics will appreciate the difference.

Leave a comment

Africa needs more AID not less

Africa needs more AID not less

Just kidding, caught you eye though didn’t it?…

As someone who routinely criticizes the work of International agencies in Africa I was stunned when a friend asked me a while ago “What makes you think you can do a better job than them? Or is it just because you are African”

My answer to that question is what led me to leave an OK well paid job in public affairs  to set up my own company directly involved in Sub-Saharan Africa, but more of that later.

Recently as I have gotten immersed in Social Media I’ve found myself connecting with Africans all across the Diaspora(or as my friend@MatthewWoods calls it expatriate Africans..what is the difference between expatriates and Diasporans?).

Through Twitter and Facebook we share stories and articles that affirm our views on how Aid is destroying the continent or how corrupt the ruling elites are and more along those lines.

Recently I’ve been thinking about whether to up sticks and move to an African country for good, these thoughts have led me to question my constant criticism of well meaning agencies who send $billions of aid to the continent.

Thanks to Twitter, Facebook and the “ubiquitous” African focused blog like mine here many Africans living  cushy lives in the West have found an outlet to let out their frustration at everything from Goodluck Jonathan buying three new shiny airplanes to the horror and environmental abuse that Shell carries on in the Niger Delta with wanton disregard for life.

However the biggest whipping boy for these Angry Africans (myself included) is the “Aid Industry”, this is an industry that employs hundreds of thousands of blue-eyed consultants from the best universities in the west to figure out how to save Africa.

This industry encompasses NGO’s, Government agencies like DFID, & USAID, cultural Icons like Bob Geldof and Bono; even philantrophists like Bill Gates have not been spared the wrath of the Angry African.

The fact that 60 years on these agencies still exist tells you all you need to know(see there couldn’t resit a dig, its hardwired in me)

But the question is this,Is it time Africans in the Diaspora just shut up and got on with their lives?Or move back to the continent they claim to love and invest their skills and talents to bring about the change they talk of,or is life in the west too charmed to risk it all.

This is not a critique but rather an observation, This group I’m referring to is very different from the “Cheetahs” that Professor George Ayittey so eloquently writes about. Cheetahs & Hippos – Prof George Ayittey

The “Cheetahs” are already in working in Africa, they might not have moved permanently yet but are as involved as one can be, I’ve met many of them thanks to the new Social world, the likes of @TMSRuge who is involved in the “Women of Kireka” project, or Ida Horna whose Ethnic Supplies business helps many poor African women earn a living by making and selling accessories and ornaments.

The group I refer to are mostly in the 20’s and early 30’s earning good money in Investment Banking, Consulting and other white coloured professions.I’m not for once suggesting that being African is the only qualification these “Angry Africans” have, indeed a lot them are Ivy-league  educated or at least well educated, and successful in their chosen careers.

My gripe however is this, If we are so convinced these well meaning mostly European NGO types are wrong and lack a basic understanding of what needs to be done to eradicate the scourge of poverty from the motherland, why haven’t they re-located en-mass to Africa to make a difference.

In my current role I meet a lot of people looking to go Africa to set up companies, whether they be Social Enterprises or Oil companies looking for advice on how to lobby African Governments. What strikes me is that a lot these people are not Africans but rather Europeans or even the Chinese.

I asked friends of mine who like me have African backgrounds what it would take to go back,their responses were unambiguous!!

Unless they could find  expat jobs that would pay them similar salaries to what they were currently on or roles with International organisations like ..you guessed it DFID, IFC, USAID and the usual NGO’s, then they would be staying put and commenting from the sidelines.

I know its easy to write all of this off as anecdotal but if you an African based in the West who is angry at how Africa is being mismanaged, why haven’t you taken you skills and experience to a place where it would properly make more of a difference than your office in Wall Street, Silicon Valley or the City of London.

As for me, a friend and I have set up a consultancy Burkson & Bampoh to advise people looking to set up companies in Africa, as well as advising African start-ups looking to access Western Markets on Regulatory frameworks, Funding opportunities and Legal issues they might face.
If you know of any African Start-ups that could do with our help, then please pass on the details.

In November last year 5 of us organised “BarCamp Africa-UK” to showcase how companies in the UK are using technology to make a difference on the continent, this year we hope to flip that around and offer African companies a chance to show people in the UK how they are using technology to create wealth, eradicate poverty and make a change. If you would like to take part please keep an eye out on this blog for details…

A great man once said Talk is cheap…..Screaming about how Aid has failed is the easy part, unless you are going to make yourself part of the solution then its probably best you go back to re-tweeting the article you’ve just read on how you need to shut up or pack your bags and go to where your skills can make a difference. :)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,158 other followers